Published: 20 June 2024Updated: 21 June 2024
1 of 6
As soon as I saw the Triumph Scrambler 400 X I wanted a go. It looked somehow more grown up than its simultaneously launched stablemate, the Speed 400, and I thought a lightweight single would be more fun on the dirt, too.
- Previous update: Am I too heavy for a Scrambler 400 X?
The Scrambler’s road handling impressed me, though, and it got me thinking about the 17in front wheel and road tyres on the Speed and how I might be missing out on a better road experience.
The FOMO got even stronger when I read in the Scrambler’s manual that it is “designed for on-road and light off-road use” – unpaved, dirt or gravel roads but specifically not jumps or obstacles.
![Triumph Scrambler 400 X vs Speed 400 long-term test (8) Triumph Scrambler 400 X vs Speed 400 long-term test (8)](https://i0.wp.com/www.motorcyclenews.com/dist/_5-99-46/images/placeholders/transparent.600x400.png)
What’s that kit?
- Roadskin Taranis Elite AAA jeans review
- Goldtop Bobber jacket review
- Forma Arbo Dry boots review
I didn’t expect the Scrambler to be a motocrosser, but Triumph’s own modesty about its capability on the dirt made me wonder what exactly I’m sacrificing better road holding for.
As I said, the Scrambler handles better than I imagined and I suspect a few extra clicks of rear preload will improve it even more, but when you really crank it over there’s a vagueness from the Metzeler Karoo Street dual-purpose tyres that leaves you unsure of how hard you can push.
There’s only one way to find out if the grass is really greener on the other bike, and that’s to have a go, so, I traded the Scrambler for a Speed 400 for a week. The first thing I noticed was that the Speed sounds even better than the Scrambler.
![Triumph Scrambler 400 X vs Speed 400 long-term test (9) Triumph Scrambler 400 X vs Speed 400 long-term test (9)](https://i0.wp.com/www.motorcyclenews.com/dist/_5-99-46/images/placeholders/transparent.600x400.png)
I love the raw bark of the single-cylinder 400; it sounds like a motocross engine. The stock exhaust on the Scrambler sounds great, but the single exit end can on the Speed is meatier, bassier, and sounds less whiny at high revs.
- Related: Best retro bike kit
The next most obvious difference is the braking power. I expected the Speed 400 to handle better thanks to its Pirelli Diablo Rosso III tyres but I wasn’t prepared for how much extra braking force they would allow.
When a van pulled out on me on the first ride home, in fact, I almost threw myself over the handlebars grabbing the same amount of front brake I would have done on the Scrambler.
![Triumph Scrambler 400 X vs Speed 400 long-term test (10) Triumph Scrambler 400 X vs Speed 400 long-term test (10)](https://i0.wp.com/www.motorcyclenews.com/dist/_5-99-46/images/placeholders/transparent.600x400.png)
Strangely, the Speed 400 feels more urgent on the power, too, and I’m not entirely sure why. The power, gearing and rear wheel are all the same (the Scrambler has one fewer teeth on the front sprocket to compensate for a larger tyre circumference but you should end up back where you started).
So, either the riding position gives a greater sensation of speed, or the particular bike I borrowed just had a bit more poke than my long-termer. A couple of horses make all the difference at this end of the power spectrum. I’ll be taking both variants for speed testing for a future update on this.
Handling things
The Speed 400 handles every bit as well as I expected it to. When you’ve only got 40bhp to play with, you want to avoid scrubbing speed and carry as much momentum as possible through the corners.
![Triumph Scrambler 400 X vs Speed 400 long-term test (11) Triumph Scrambler 400 X vs Speed 400 long-term test (11)](https://i0.wp.com/www.motorcyclenews.com/dist/_5-99-46/images/placeholders/transparent.600x400.png)
You can do this more effectively on the Speed with the smaller front wheel making tip-in more purposeful and controlled. You can pick a line more accurately, too, and get far closer to the edge of the tyre without the wooliness of the Scrambler.
You’d think it was a landslide victory for the Speed and that’s before I’ve even mentioned that it’s £600 cheaper to buy.
Unfortunately, there are a few drawbacks. The bar end mirrors make the handlebars vibrate so badly that the accelerometers in my Beeline Moto II sat nav stopped working at 70mph. It’s also less roomy, feeling more toy-like than the grown-up Scrambler, and not as comfortable for my 6ft frame.
![Triumph Scrambler 400 X vs Speed 400 long-term test (12) Triumph Scrambler 400 X vs Speed 400 long-term test (12)](https://i0.wp.com/www.motorcyclenews.com/dist/_5-99-46/images/placeholders/transparent.600x400.png)
Finally, I much prefer the look of the off-road pretender Scrambler, and that’s sort of the point of a ‘modern retro’. The improvement in handling isn’t enough to outweigh the drawbacks in my book, it’s only at the extremes that you notice the difference, and the Scrambler is genuinely capable of scraping its pegs, if you so wish.
It’s a close run thing, but the Scrambler 400 X comes out on top for me. The Speed almost turned my head, but not quite.
By Ben Clarke
Deputy Head of Digital (Motorcycling), Ben Clarke began riding (legally) at 21-years-old when he passed his direct access one month before shipping his Yamaha XT660 R to Miami and embarking on a 13,500-mile tour of the USA and Central America.He's worked at MCN for the last six years, riding everything from super nakeds and superbikes to small-capacity electrics and scooters across several continents.In more recent years, he's worked closely with the bike kit team to bring you all the latest news and reviews about the bike-related products we all use every day.
Advertisem*nt
Ben considers the Triumph Speed 400